Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWM vs XLP: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWM returned +14.1% to XLP's +13.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWM and XLP
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $75.5bn for iShares Russell 2000 ETF and $14.6bn for State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF.
Pair scorecard
XLP costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.3 points; IWM is 5.2 times larger.
| Measure | IWM | XLP |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +14.1% | +13.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 7.6%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | 3.5%, high on Oct 22, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell 2000 Index | Consumer Staples Select Sector Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.19% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $75.5bn | $14.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 3.3% | 62.9% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Jun 2, 2000 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,377 weekly returnsIWM returned slightly more: +656.6% to +619.2%. XLP swung less: 13.7% to 22.3%. XLP fell less at its worst: −34.6% to −57.7%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | IWM | XLP | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +656.6% | +619.2% | IWM (slight) | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +7.9% | +7.7% | IWM (slight) | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +438.6% | +280.9% | IWM | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 22.3% | 13.7% | XLP | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 15.7% | 9.9% | XLP | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −57.7% | −34.6% | XLP | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.38 | 0.48 | XLP | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.53 | 0.67 | XLP | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.14 | 0.22 | XLP | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,377 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWM and XLP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWM and XLP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWM and XLP do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. IWM follows Russell 2000 Index and XLP follows Consumer Staples Select Sector Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- Number of holdings. IWM holds 1,977 positions and XLP holds 36.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
IWM
IWM tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,977 positions, with the top ten at 3.3%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
XLP
XLP tracks an index of Consumer staples. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 36 positions, with the top ten at 62.9%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWM or XLP?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWM returned +14.1% and XLP +13.8%.
- Which is cheaper, IWM or XLP?
- XLP is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWM against XLP, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwm-vs-xlp
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWM against XLP. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwm-vs-xlp
[IWM against XLP (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwm-vs-xlp)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.