Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IVV vs SPYI: how they differ

Over the year IVV returned more, +17.6% against +15.8%, and IVV charges 0.03% against 0.68%.

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and NEOS S&P 500(R) High Income ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IVV and SPYI hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IVV and SPYI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIVVSPYI
LINDE PLC0.33%0.37%
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC0.30%0.32%
EATON PLC0.24%0.26%
CHUBB0.19%0.19%
MEDTRONIC PLC0.18%0.16%
TRANE TECHNOLOGIES PLC0.15%0.17%
JOHNSON CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL PLC0.13%0.14%
ACCENTURE PLC CLASS A0.17%0.12%
AON PLC CLASS A0.10%0.11%
ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP0.10%0.12%
CRH PUBLIC LIMITED PLC0.09%0.11%
NXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV0.09%0.11%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IVVOnly in SPYI
NVIDIA 8.06%NVIDIA Corp 7.57%
APPLE 7.31%Apple Inc 6.59%
MICROSOFT 5.58%Microsoft Corp 4.32%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.76%Amazon.com Inc 3.65%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.98%Alphabet Inc 3.28%
BROADCOM INC 2.61%Broadcom Inc 2.80%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.38%Alphabet Inc 2.61%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.16%Micron Technology Inc 1.99%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

IVV and SPYI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
SPYI
NEOS S&P 500(R) High Income ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundIncome ETF
IssueriSharesNEOS
What it isS&P 500covered call, vs SPY
Total return, 1 year+17.6%+15.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.1 pts−1.7 pts
Cash paid, 1 yearnot an income fund12.1%
Expense ratio0.03%0.68%
Holdings505not filed

IVV in plain words

IVV is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 505 positions, with the top ten at 38.1%.

SPYI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, SPYI paid 12.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +17.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.7 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.2%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 93% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IVV or SPYI?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVV returned +17.6% and SPYI returned +15.8%, so IVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IVV or SPYI?
IVV charges 0.03% a year and SPYI charges 0.68%, so IVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are IVV and SPYI the same kind of fund?
No. IVV is an index ETF and SPYI is an option-income ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IVV against SPYI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IVV against SPYI, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ivv-vs-spyi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources