Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IGM vs IJH: how they differ
IGM and IJH hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and IGM returned more over the year.
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IGM and IJH hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IGM | IJH |
|---|---|---|
| TWILIO CLASS A | 0.16% | 1.00% |
| EVERPURE INC CLASS A | 0.13% | 0.85% |
| OKTA CLASS A | 0.13% | 0.82% |
| ENTEGRIS INC | 0.09% | 0.60% |
| TD SYNNEX | 0.09% | 0.55% |
| MACOM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS | 0.08% | 0.51% |
| MKS | 0.08% | 0.51% |
| NUTANIX CLASS A | 0.08% | 0.50% |
| DYNATRACE INC | 0.07% | 0.43% |
| LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR | 0.07% | 0.45% |
| SEMTECH | 0.07% | 0.42% |
| DOCUSIGN | 0.06% | 0.37% |
| Only in IGM | Only in IJH |
|---|---|
| MICROSOFT 10.11% | ILLUMINA INC 0.87% |
| APPLE 9.14% | TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.86% |
| NVIDIA 8.89% | ATI 0.78% |
| BROADCOM INC 7.42% | NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.72% |
| META PLATFORMS CLASS A 4.87% | TENET HEALTHCARE CORP 0.65% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY 4.73% | CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY 0.64% |
| ALPHABET CLASS A 4.23% | UNITED THERAPEUTICS 0.61% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 3.66% | XPO 0.61% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Expanded Tech Sector | S&P MidCap 400 |
| Total return, 1 year | +32.7% | +13.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +15.2 pts | −4.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.37% | 0.05% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 92.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 272 | 405 |
IGM in plain words
IGM is an index equity fund tracking the Expanded Tech Sector. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 272 positions, with the top ten at 58.6%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
IJH in plain words
IJH is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 405 positions, with the top ten at 7.8%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IGM or IJH?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGM returned +32.7% and IJH returned +13.4%, so IGM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IGM or IJH?
- IGM charges 0.37% a year and IJH charges 0.05%, so IJH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IGM and IJH overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IGM and 0% of IJH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IGM against IJH, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/igm-vs-ijh Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources