Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IGIB vs TLT: how they differ
IGIB and TLT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IGIB returned more over the year.
iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IGIB and TLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in IGIB | Only in TLT |
|---|---|
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.60% | TREASURY BOND (2OLD) 4.16% |
| ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES LLC 0.20% | TREASURY BOND (OLD) 4.05% |
| SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES COR 144A 0.19% | TREASURY BOND (OTR) 1.03% |
| PFIZER INVESTMENT ENTERPRISES PTE 0.18% | TREASURY BOND 0.02% |
| QTS FAYETTEVILLE I DC1-2 LLC 144A 0.15% | |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO MTN 0.13% | |
| MORGAN STANLEY (FXD-FRN) MTN 0.12% | |
| WELLS FARGO & COMPANY (FXD-FRN) MTN 0.12% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| IGIB iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond | 20+ year Treasuries |
| Total return, 1 year | −1.0% | −6.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −18.5 pts | −23.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.15% |
| Holdings | 2951 | 41 |
IGIB in plain words
IGIB is a bond fund tracking the 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −1.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
TLT in plain words
TLT is a bond fund tracking the 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.9% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IGIB or TLT?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGIB returned −1.0% and TLT returned −6.4%, so IGIB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IGIB or TLT?
- IGIB charges 0.04% a year and TLT charges 0.15%, so IGIB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IGIB against TLT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/igib-vs-tlt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources