Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IDEV vs VLUE: how they differ

IDEV and VLUE hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and VLUE returned more over the year.

iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IDEV and VLUE hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IDEV and VLUE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIDEVVLUE
ROCHE PS PAR AG1.02%0.34%
LOBLAW COMPANIES LTD0.09%0.10%
HELVETIA BALOISE HOLDING N AG0.07%0.19%
BAWAG GROUP AG0.05%0.39%
EQT0.05%0.17%
ADMIRAL GROUP PLC0.04%1.02%
KEYERA0.04%0.11%
TELENOR0.03%0.66%
BALFOUR BEATTY PLC0.02%0.37%
PERSEUS MINING LTD0.02%0.42%
SODEXO SA0.02%0.17%
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY0.01%0.15%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IDEVOnly in VLUE
ASML HOLDING 2.29%MICRON TECHNOLOGY 21.65%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.22%CISCO SYSTEMS INC 4.14%
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 0.98%GENERAL MOTORS 3.72%
SHELL PLC 0.91%VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC 3.05%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 0.88%BANK OF AMERICA 2.15%
NOVARTIS AG 0.87%FORD MOTOR CO 1.94%
NESTLE SA 0.85%COMCAST CLASS A 1.79%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.83%HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE 1.74%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

IDEV and VLUE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IDEV
iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF
VLUE
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isCore MSCI International Developed MarketsMSCI USA Value Factor
Total return, 1 year+18.7%+69.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.2 pts+51.9 pts
Expense ratio0.04%0.15%
Already in the S&P 5000.1%96.9%
Holdings1782148

IDEV in plain words

IDEV is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI International Developed Markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1782 positions, with the top ten at 10.6%.

VLUE in plain words

VLUE is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Value Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +69.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 148 positions, with the top ten at 44.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IDEV or VLUE?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IDEV returned +18.7% and VLUE returned +69.4%, so VLUE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IDEV or VLUE?
IDEV charges 0.04% a year and VLUE charges 0.15%, so IDEV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IDEV and VLUE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IDEV and 97% of VLUE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IDEV against VLUE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IDEV against VLUE, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/idev-vs-vlue Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources