Which returned more over the last year, IBIT or IWC?

In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IBIT returned −31.1% and IWC returned +26.7%, so IWC returned more.

Which is cheaper, IBIT or IWC?

IBIT charges 0.25% a year and IWC charges 0.60%, so IBIT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 21, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IBIT vs IWC: how they differ

IBIT and IWC hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IWC returned more over the year.

iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF and iShares Micro-Cap ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IBIT and IWC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IBIT and IWC both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding	IBIT	IWC
USD CASH	0.00%	0.03%

Only in each
Only in IBIT	Only in IWC
BITCOIN 100.00%	CAREDX 0.64%
	HYPERLIQUID STRATEGIES INC 0.62%
	PENGUIN SOLUTIONS INC 0.62%
	NURIX THERAPEUTICS 0.56%
	OUSTER 0.53%
	SELLAS LIFE SCIENCES GROUP INC 0.53%
	STRIVE INC CLASS A 0.52%
	VIRIDIAN THERAPEUTICS ORS 0.51%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

IBIT and IWC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF
Where it sits	Core fund	Core fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	Holds bitcoin	Tracks the Russell Microcap
Total return, 1 year	−31.1%	+26.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	−47.6 pts	+10.1 pts
Expense ratio	0.25%	0.60%
Holdings	2	1376
Net assets	$63.7bn	$1.4bn

IBIT in plain words

IBIT holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.1% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.

IWC in plain words

IWC tracks the Russell Microcap. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +26.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1376 positions, with the top ten at 5.4%. It sat 5.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 18, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IBIT or IWC?: In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IBIT returned −31.1% and IWC returned +26.7%, so IWC returned more.
Which is cheaper, IBIT or IWC?: IBIT charges 0.25% a year and IWC charges 0.60%, so IBIT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IBIT against IWC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IBIT against IWC, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibit-vs-iwc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources