Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IAU vs SGOV: how they differ
IAU is a commodity fund and SGOV a short-term Treasury fund, and over the year IAU returned more, +19.2% against +3.8%.
iShares Gold Trust and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF.
| IAU iShares Gold Trust | SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Gold | 0-3 month T-bills |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.2% | +3.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.7 pts | −13.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.09% |
| Holdings | not filed | 23 |
IAU in plain words
IAU is a commodity fund tracking the Gold. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 19.6% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SGOV in plain words
SGOV is a cash and treasury bills tracking the 0-3 month T-bills. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IAU or SGOV?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IAU returned +19.2% and SGOV returned +3.8%, so IAU returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IAU or SGOV?
- IAU charges 0.25% a year and SGOV charges 0.09%, so SGOV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IAU against SGOV, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iau-vs-sgov Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources