Which returned more over the last year, HYMB or MTUM?

In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HYMB returned −1.0% and MTUM +18.4%.

Which is cheaper, HYMB or MTUM?

MTUM is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. That is about $20 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

HYMB vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, HYMB returned −1.0% to MTUM's +18.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about HYMB and MTUM

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $3.8bn for State Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF and $18.7bn for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF.

HYMB on its own →MTUM on its own →

At a glance

−1.0%

HYMB total return, 1 year

+18.4%

MTUM total return, 1 year

0.35%

HYMB expense ratio

0.15%

MTUM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MTUM costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 19.4 points; MTUM is 4.9 times larger.

HYMB vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	HYMB	MTUM
Return
Measure	HYMB	MTUM
Total return, 1 year	−1.0%	+18.4%
Drawdown
Measure	HYMB	MTUM
Below its high	4.7%, high on Jul 2, 2026	11.9%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	HYMB	MTUM
What it tracks	ICE US Select High Yield Crossover Municipal Index	MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index
Cost and size
Measure	HYMB	MTUM
Expense ratio	0.35%	0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026	$3.8bn	$18.7bn
Holdings
Measure	HYMB	MTUM
Holdings in common	0%
In the S&P 500, by weight		93%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund		35.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, HYMB and MTUM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first HYMB MTUM

Only in one fund ↓

Only in HYMB

PRCGEN 5.000 07/01/58 1.94%

PRCGEN 4.784 07/01/58 1.25%

BUCGEN 5.000 06/01/55 1.08%

PRC 4.000 07/01/46 0.64%

PRCGEN 4.329 07/01/40 0.61%

NYCDEV 5.000 11/15/44 0.49%

PRC 4.000 07/01/41 0.47%

CHIEDU 6.000 12/01/41 0.46%

Only in MTUM

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 6.06%

MICRON TECHNOLOGY 5.00%

INTEL CORPORATION 3.92%

CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.64%

JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.45%

EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.96%

PALO ALTO NETWORKS 2.88%

ALPHABET CLASS A 2.62%

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

HYMB State Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF

Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF

Issuer State Street iShares

What it is Tracks an index of Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond Tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor

Total return, 1 year −1.0% +18.4%

Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) +13.6% (MLRG)

Gap to its benchmark +0.4 pts vs AGG +4.8 pts vs MLRG

Expense ratio 0.35% 0.15%

Holdings 2105 126

Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $3.8bn $18.7bn

HYMB and MTUM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

HYMB

HYMB tracks an index of Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.0% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. It sat 4.7% below its high of Jul 2, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MTUM

MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 35.5%. It sat 11.9% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HYMB or MTUM?: In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HYMB returned −1.0% and MTUM +18.4%.
Which is cheaper, HYMB or MTUM?: MTUM is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. That is about $20 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

HYMB vs SPHQ HYMB vs SPMO AVUS vs HYMB HYMB vs USMV MTUM vs VTEB MTUM vs MUB MTUM vs VCLT MTUM vs VUSB

Where to next

HYMB on its own →MTUM on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →HYMB dividend history →HYMB holdings →MTUM dividend history →MTUM holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

HYMB filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

HYMB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

State Street website ↗

MTUM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

MTUM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for MTUM ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, HYMB against MTUM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hymb-vs-mtum

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.