Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
HYG vs XLC: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, HYG returned +1.3% to XLC's −10.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about HYG and XLCNet assets on Oct 27, 2026: $17.5bn for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF and $22.1bn for State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF.
Pair scorecard
XLC costs 0.41 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.7 points; XLC is 1.3 times larger.
| Measure | HYG | XLC |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +1.3% | −10.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 13.3%, high on Jan 30, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index | Communication Services Select Sector Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $17.5bn | $22.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 100% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 75.3% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, HYG and XLC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
HYG and XLC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
HYG
HYG tracks an index of US high yield bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.3% with distributions reinvested, against −1.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year.
XLC
XLC tracks an index of Communication services. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −10.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 23 positions, with the top ten at 75.3%. It sat 13.3% below its high of Jan 30, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, HYG or XLC?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HYG returned +1.3% and XLC −10.4%.
- Which is cheaper, HYG or XLC?
- XLC is cheaper, by 0.41 percentage points a year. That is about $41 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, HYG against XLC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hyg-vs-xlc
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). HYG against XLC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hyg-vs-xlc
[HYG against XLC (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hyg-vs-xlc)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.