Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

HGER vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, HGER returned +46.9% to TLT's −7.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about HGER and TLT

Net assets: $5.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF, and $47.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.

At a glance
+46.9%
HGER total return, 1 year
−7.9%
TLT total return, 1 year
0.68%
HGER expense ratio
0.15%
TLT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

TLT costs 0.53 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 54.8 points; TLT is 9.5 times larger.

HGER vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureHGERTLT
Return
Total return, 1 year+46.9%−7.9%
Drawdown
Below its high42.6%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Benchmark
What it tracksQuantix Commodity IndexICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.68%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$5.0bn$47.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, HGER and TLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first HGER TLT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in HGER
Only in TLT
TREASURY BOND 4.32%
TREASURY BOND 4.12%
TREASURY BOND (OLD) 4.07%
TREASURY BOND 4.02%
TREASURY BOND 3.93%
TREASURY BOND 3.92%
TREASURY BOND 3.89%
TREASURY BOND 3.88%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy Tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries
Total return, 1 year +46.9% −7.9%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured −7.8% (BBLB)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.1 pts vs BBLB
Expense ratio 0.68% 0.15%
Holdings 0 47
Net assets, HGER as of Oct 28, 2026 and TLT as of Oct 27, 2026 $5.0bn $47.4bn

HGER and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

HGER and TLT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
HGER

HGER tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +46.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.68% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 0 positions, with the top ten at not published.

TLT

TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −7.9% with distributions reinvested, against −7.8% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.6% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HGER or TLT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HGER returned +46.9% and TLT −7.9%.
Which is cheaper, HGER or TLT?
TLT is cheaper, by 0.53 percentage points a year. That is about $53 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, HGER against TLT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hger-vs-tlt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.