Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

HGER vs LQD: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, HGER returned +46.9% to LQD's −3.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about HGER and LQD

Net assets: $5.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF, and $30.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF.

At a glance
+46.9%
HGER total return, 1 year
−3.4%
LQD total return, 1 year
0.68%
HGER expense ratio
0.14%
LQD expense ratio

Pair scorecard

LQD costs 0.54 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 50.3 points; LQD is 6.1 times larger.

HGER vs LQD: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureHGERLQD
Return
Total return, 1 year+46.9%−3.4%
Drawdown
Below its high6.3%, high on Sep 22, 2021
Benchmark
What it tracksQuantix Commodity IndexMarkit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.68%0.14%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$5.0bn$30.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, HGER and LQD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first HGER LQD
Only in one fund ↓
Only in HGER
Only in LQD
ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES LLC 0.20%
CVS HEALTH CORP 0.17%
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES COR 144A 0.16%
T-MOBILE USA INC 0.16%
AMAZON.COM INC 0.14%
BOEING CO 0.14%
CITIGROUP INC 0.14%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 0.14%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy Tracks an index of US investment grade bonds
Total return, 1 year +46.9% −3.4%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured −1.2% (IUSB)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −2.2 pts vs IUSB
Expense ratio 0.68% 0.14%
Holdings 0 3191
Net assets, HGER as of Oct 28, 2026 and LQD as of Oct 27, 2026 $5.0bn $30.6bn

HGER and LQD on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

HGER and LQD flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
HGER

HGER tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +46.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.68% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 0 positions, with the top ten at not published.

LQD

LQD tracks an index of US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.3% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HGER or LQD?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HGER returned +46.9% and LQD −3.4%.
Which is cheaper, HGER or LQD?
LQD is cheaper, by 0.54 percentage points a year. That is about $54 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, HGER against LQD, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hger-vs-lqd

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.