Which returned more over the last year, GRNY or TLT?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GRNY returned +13.8% and TLT returned −6.4%, so GRNY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, GRNY or TLT?

GRNY charges 0.75% a year and TLT charges 0.15%, so TLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GRNY vs TLT: how they differ

GRNY and TLT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and GRNY returned more over the year.

Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GRNY and TLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GRNY	Only in TLT
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.17%	TREASURY BOND (2OLD) 4.16%
Quanta Services Inc 3.20%	TREASURY BOND (OLD) 4.05%
GE Vernova Inc 3.05%	TREASURY BOND (OTR) 1.03%
Amazon.com Inc 3.02%	TREASURY BOND 0.02%
Strategy Inc 3.01%
Alphabet Inc 2.96%
Broadcom Inc 2.94%
Arista Networks Inc 2.88%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

GRNY and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF	TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Fundstrat	iShares
What it is	Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap	20+ year Treasuries
Total return, 1 year	+13.8%	−6.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−3.7 pts	−23.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.75%	0.15%
Holdings	40	41

GRNY in plain words

GRNY is an index equity fund tracking the Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 40 positions, with the top ten at 30.8%.

TLT in plain words

TLT is a bond fund tracking the 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.9% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GRNY or TLT?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GRNY returned +13.8% and TLT returned −6.4%, so GRNY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GRNY or TLT?: GRNY charges 0.75% a year and TLT charges 0.15%, so TLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GRNY against TLT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GRNY against TLT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/grny-vs-tlt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources