Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or IBIT?

In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +15.7% and IBIT returned −31.1%, so FDVV returned more.

Which is cheaper, FDVV or IBIT?

FDVV charges 0.15% a year and IBIT charges 0.25%, so FDVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 21, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FDVV vs IBIT: how they differ

FDVV and IBIT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FDVV returned more over the year.

Fidelity High Dividend ETF and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and IBIT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in FDVV	Only in IBIT
NVIDIA CORP 6.86%	BITCOIN 100.00%
APPLE INC 5.70%	USD CASH 0.00%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.50%
BROADCOM INC 3.50%
JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.58%
ALPHABET INC 2.21%
COCA COLA CO 1.85%
PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 1.81%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

FDVV and IBIT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
Where it sits	Core fund	Core fund
Issuer	Fidelity	iShares
What it is	Tracks an index of High Dividend	Holds bitcoin
Total return, 1 year	+15.7%	−31.1%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	−0.8 pts	−47.6 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.25%
Holdings	96	2
Net assets	$10.4bn	$63.7bn

FDVV in plain words

FDVV tracks an index of High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +15.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.

IBIT in plain words

IBIT holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.1% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or IBIT?: In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +15.7% and IBIT returned −31.1%, so FDVV returned more.
Which is cheaper, FDVV or IBIT?: FDVV charges 0.15% a year and IBIT charges 0.25%, so FDVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FDVV against IBIT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDVV against IBIT, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdvv-vs-ibit Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources