Which returned more over the last year, FBTC or ILF?

In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBTC returned −31.0% and ILF returned +28.1%, so ILF returned more.

Which is cheaper, FBTC or ILF?

FBTC charges 0.25% a year and ILF charges 0.47%, so FBTC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 21, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FBTC vs ILF: how they differ

FBTC is a spot crypto ETP and ILF an equity index fund, and over the year ILF returned more, +28.1% against −31.0%.

Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund and iShares Latin America 40 ETF.

FBTC and ILF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	ILF iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Where it sits	Core fund	Core fund
Issuer	Fidelity	iShares
What it is	Holds bitcoin	Tracks an index of Latin America 40
Total return, 1 year	−31.0%	+28.1%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	−47.6 pts	+11.5 pts
Expense ratio	0.25%	0.47%
Holdings	not filed	56
Net assets	$13.9bn	$3.9bn

FBTC in plain words

FBTC holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.

ILF in plain words

ILF tracks an index of Latin America 40. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +28.1% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 56 positions, with the top ten at 54.5%. It sat 6.9% below its high of Apr 14, 2026 on Sep 18, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBTC or ILF?: In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBTC returned −31.0% and ILF returned +28.1%, so ILF returned more.
Which is cheaper, FBTC or ILF?: FBTC charges 0.25% a year and ILF charges 0.47%, so FBTC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FBTC against ILF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBTC against ILF, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbtc-vs-ilf Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources