Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EWY vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWY returned +79.7% to MAGS's +5.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWY and MAGS

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $24.4bn for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF and $5.5bn for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.

At a glance
+79.7%
EWY total return, 1 year
+5.8%
MAGS total return, 1 year
0.59%
EWY expense ratio
0.30%
MAGS expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MAGS costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 73.9 points; EWY is 4.4 times larger.

EWY vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWYMAGS
Return
Total return, 1 year+79.7%+5.8%
Drawdown
Below its high24.3%, high on Jun 18, 20264.1%, high on Oct 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Korea 25/50 Daily 25 Capped IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.30%
Net assets$24.4bn$5.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund60.9%29.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EWY and MAGS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWY MAGS
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EWY
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 23.14%
SK HYNIX 23.11%
SK SQUARE 2.78%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS LTD 2.67%
KB FINANCIAL GROUP 2.06%
SHINHAN FINANCIAL GROUP 1.54%
HYUNDAI MOTOR 1.51%
HANA FINANCIAL GROUP 1.39%
Only in MAGS
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 6.83%
NVIDIA Corp 3.52%
Apple Inc 3.49%
Amazon.com Inc 3.48%
Tesla Inc 3.45%
Microsoft Corp 3.07%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.04%
Alphabet Inc 2.45%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI South Korea Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +79.7% +5.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.3% (EEM) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +63.4 pts vs EEM not measured
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.30%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 22.5%
Holdings 78 8
Net assets $24.4bn $5.5bn

EWY and MAGS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EWY and MAGS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EWY

EWY tracks the MSCI South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 60.9%. It sat 24.3% below its high of Jun 18, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MAGS

MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWY or MAGS?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWY returned +79.7% and MAGS +5.8%.
Which is cheaper, EWY or MAGS?
MAGS is cheaper, by 0.29 percentage points a year. That is about $29 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EWY and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWY and 22% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWY against MAGS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewy-vs-mags

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.