Which returned more over the last year, ETHA or VGLT?

In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ETHA returned −42.6% and VGLT returned −4.0%, so VGLT returned more.

Which is cheaper, ETHA or VGLT?

ETHA charges 0.25% a year and VGLT charges 0.03%, so VGLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 21, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ETHA vs VGLT: how they differ

ETHA and VGLT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VGLT returned more over the year.

iShares Ethereum Trust ETF and Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ETHA and VGLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ETHA and VGLT both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding	ETHA	VGLT
USD CASH	0.00%	-0.03%

Only in each
Only in ETHA	Only in VGLT
ETHER 100.00%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.18%
	United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.13%
	United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.12%
	United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.09%
	United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.09%
	United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.08%
	United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.08%
	United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.04%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

ETHA and VGLT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF	VGLT Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
Where it sits	Core fund	Core fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	Holds ether	Tracks an index of Long-term Treasury
Total return, 1 year	−42.6%	−4.0%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	−59.2 pts	−20.6 pts
Expense ratio	0.25%	0.03%
Holdings	2	104
Net assets	$9.2bn	$10.6bn

ETHA in plain words

ETHA holds ether. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −42.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 45.6% below its high of Aug 22, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.

VGLT in plain words

VGLT tracks an index of Long-term Treasury. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −4.0% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 39.0% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 18, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ETHA or VGLT?: In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ETHA returned −42.6% and VGLT returned −4.0%, so VGLT returned more.
Which is cheaper, ETHA or VGLT?: ETHA charges 0.25% a year and VGLT charges 0.03%, so VGLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ETHA against VGLT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ETHA against VGLT, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/etha-vs-vglt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources