Which returned more over the last year, ETHA or JNK?

In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ETHA returned −42.6% and JNK returned +3.0%, so JNK returned more.

Which is cheaper, ETHA or JNK?

ETHA charges 0.25% a year and JNK charges 0.40%, so ETHA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 21, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ETHA vs JNK: how they differ

ETHA and JNK hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and JNK returned more over the year.

iShares Ethereum Trust ETF and State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ETHA and JNK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in ETHA	Only in JNK
ETHER 100.00%	1261229 BC LTD SR SECURED 144A 04/32 10 0.68%
USD CASH 0.00%	SSI US GOV MONEY MARKET CLASS 0.65%
	MERIDIAN ARC HOLDCO LLC SR SECURED 144A 04/31 6.25 0.59%
	QUIKRETE HOLDINGS INC SR SECURED 144A 03/32 6.375 0.48%
	PR RNO PROPERTY OWNER 1 SR SECURED 144A 05/31 6.5 0.46%
	ECHOSTAR CORP SR SECURED 11/29 10.75 0.45%
	CLOUD SOFTWARE GRP LLC SR SECURED 144A 03/29 6.5 0.41%
	VENTURE GLOBAL LNG INC SR SECURED 144A 02/29 9.5 0.41%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

ETHA and JNK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF	JNK State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core fund	Core fund
Issuer	iShares	State Street
What it is	Holds ether	Tracks the Bloomberg High Yield Bond
Total return, 1 year	−42.6%	+3.0%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	−59.2 pts	−13.6 pts
Expense ratio	0.25%	0.40%
Holdings	2	1193
Net assets	$9.2bn	$6.8bn

ETHA in plain words

ETHA holds ether. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −42.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 45.6% below its high of Aug 22, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.

JNK in plain words

JNK tracks the Bloomberg High Yield Bond. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +3.0% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ETHA or JNK?: In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ETHA returned −42.6% and JNK returned +3.0%, so JNK returned more.
Which is cheaper, ETHA or JNK?: ETHA charges 0.25% a year and JNK charges 0.40%, so ETHA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ETHA against JNK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ETHA against JNK, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/etha-vs-jnk Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources