Which returned more over the last year, ETHA or FLKR?

In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ETHA returned −42.6% and FLKR returned +126.4%, so FLKR returned more.

Which is cheaper, ETHA or FLKR?

ETHA charges 0.25% a year and FLKR charges 0.09%, so FLKR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 21, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ETHA vs FLKR: how they differ

ETHA and FLKR hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FLKR returned more over the year.

iShares Ethereum Trust ETF and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ETHA and FLKR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in ETHA	Only in FLKR
ETHER 100.00%	SK HYNIX INC 23.85%
USD CASH 0.00%	SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 15.68%
	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 13.10%
	SK SQUARE CO LTD 3.75%
	SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS 3.64%
	HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY 2.14%
	KB FINANCIAL GROUP INC 1.75%
	SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 1.73%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

ETHA and FLKR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF	FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
Where it sits	Core fund	Core fund
Issuer	iShares	Franklin
What it is	Holds ether	Tracks the FTSE South Korea
Total return, 1 year	−42.6%	+126.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	−59.2 pts	+109.8 pts
Expense ratio	0.25%	0.09%
Holdings	2	157
Net assets	$9.2bn	$1.7bn

ETHA in plain words

ETHA holds ether. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −42.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 45.6% below its high of Aug 22, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.

FLKR in plain words

FLKR tracks the FTSE South Korea. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +126.4% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 157 positions, with the top ten at 68.2%. It sat 17.4% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 18, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ETHA or FLKR?: In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ETHA returned −42.6% and FLKR returned +126.4%, so FLKR returned more.
Which is cheaper, ETHA or FLKR?: ETHA charges 0.25% a year and FLKR charges 0.09%, so FLKR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ETHA against FLKR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ETHA against FLKR, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/etha-vs-flkr Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources