Which returned more over the last year, EFA or IGSB?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EFA returned +18.2% and IGSB returned +1.7%, so EFA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EFA or IGSB?

EFA charges 0.32% a year and IGSB charges 0.04%, so IGSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EFA vs IGSB: how they differ

EFA and IGSB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EFA returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI EAFE ETF and iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EFA and IGSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions EFA and IGSB both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding	EFA	IGSB
SANDS CHINA LTD	0.02%	0.01%

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EFA	Only in IGSB
ASML HOLDING 3.01%	BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.56%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.61%	EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO S. R.L. 144A 0.29%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.36%	SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES COR 144A 0.15%
SHELL PLC 1.25%	DEUTSCHE TELEKOM INTERNATIONAL FIN 0.10%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 1.15%	BAYER US FINANCE II LLC 144A 0.09%
NOVARTIS AG 1.15%	JPMORGAN CHASE & CO MTN 0.09%
NESTLE SA 1.12%	GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA (FXD-FRN) 0.08%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.09%	GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC/THE MTN 0.08%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

EFA and IGSB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF	IGSB iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	Developed markets ex US	1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond
Total return, 1 year	+18.2%	+1.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+0.7 pts	−15.8 pts
Expense ratio	0.32%	0.04%
Holdings	670	4496

EFA in plain words

EFA is an index equity fund tracking the Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 670 positions, with the top ten at 13.8%.

IGSB in plain words

IGSB is a bond fund tracking the 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EFA or IGSB?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EFA returned +18.2% and IGSB returned +1.7%, so EFA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EFA or IGSB?: EFA charges 0.32% a year and IGSB charges 0.04%, so IGSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EFA against IGSB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EFA against IGSB, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/efa-vs-igsb Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources