Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EFA vs EWY: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EFA returned +12.1% to EWY's +79.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EFA and EWY

Net assets: $76.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, and $24.4bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF.

At a glance
+12.1%
EFA total return, 1 year
+79.7%
EWY total return, 1 year
0.32%
EFA expense ratio
0.59%
EWY expense ratio

Pair scorecard

EFA costs 0.27 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 67.6 points; EFA is 3.4 times larger.

EFA vs EWY: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEFAEWY
Return
Total return, 1 year+12.1%+79.7%
Drawdown
Below its high4.7%, high on Aug 25, 202624.3%, high on Jun 18, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI EAFE IndexMSCI Korea 25/50 Daily 25 Capped Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.32%0.59%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026$76.4bn$22.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund14.3%60.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Aug 24, 2001 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,313 weekly returns
EFA EWY
Return
Total return edge EWY +367.2% +1,405.5%
Annualized edge EWY +6.3% +11.3%
Price return edge EWY +139.2% +989.0%
Risk
Volatility edge EFA 18.8% 30.0%
Max drawdown edge EFA −59.4% −70.1%
Downside capture 97.5% 103.2%
Beta 0.96 1.08
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge EWY 0.33 0.45
Sortino edge EWY 0.45 0.66
Treynor 0.055 0.124
Calmar edge EWY 0.11 0.16
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.5% a year +2.5% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.53 0.83
Information ratio 0.08 0.22
Tracking error 4.2% 14.8%

Each against its own benchmark: EFA against ACWX, Apr 11, 2008 to Oct 23, 2026; EWY against EEM, Apr 25, 2003 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

EWY returned more: +1,405.5% to +367.2%. EFA swung less: 18.8% to 30.0%. EFA fell less at its worst: −59.4% to −70.1%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: EFA vs EWY: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEFAEWYEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+367.2%+1,405.5%EWYPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+6.3%+11.3%EWYTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+139.2%+989.0%EWYPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility18.8%30.0%EFASpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.6%20.5%EFALike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−59.4%−70.1%EFADeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture95.1%115.0%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture97.5%103.2%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.961.08Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.960.74Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.330.45EWYReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.450.66EWYReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0550.124Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.110.16EWYAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkACWXEEMThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.5% a year+2.5% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.530.83Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−1.4% to +2.4%−3.4% to +8.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.080.22Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error4.2%14.8%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,313 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EFA and EWY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EFA EWY
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EFA
ASML HOLDING 2.98%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.58%
SHELL 1.42%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.38%
NOVARTIS AG 1.33%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.21%
NESTLE SA 1.21%
SAP 1.13%
Only in EWY
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 23.14%
SK HYNIX 23.11%
SK SQUARE 2.78%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS LTD 2.67%
KB FINANCIAL GROUP 2.06%
SHINHAN FINANCIAL GROUP 1.54%
HYUNDAI MOTOR 1.51%
HANA FINANCIAL GROUP 1.39%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Developed markets ex US Tracks the MSCI South Korea
Total return, 1 year +12.1% +79.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (ACWX) +16.3% (EEM)
Gap to its benchmark −2.2 pts vs ACWX +63.4 pts vs EEM
Expense ratio 0.32% 0.59%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 665 78
Net assets, EFA as of Oct 27, 2026 and EWY as of Oct 28, 2026 $76.8bn $24.4bn

EFA and EWY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-2589BB1701

EFA and EWY do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. EFA follows MSCI EAFE Index and EWY follows MSCI Korea 25/50 Daily 25 Capped Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EFA returned +12.1% and EWY +79.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 67.6 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

EFA and EWY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EFA

EFA tracks an index of Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 665 positions, with the top ten at 14.3%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

EWY

EWY tracks the MSCI South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 60.9%. It sat 24.3% below its high of Jun 18, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EFA or EWY?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EFA returned +12.1% and EWY +79.7%.
Which is cheaper, EFA or EWY?
EFA is cheaper, by 0.27 percentage points a year. That is about $27 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EFA and EWY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EFA and 0% of EWY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EFA against EWY, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/efa-vs-ewy

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.