Which returned more over the last year, EDV or MTUM?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EDV returned −10.8% and MTUM returned +21.8%, so MTUM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EDV or MTUM?

EDV charges 0.05% a year and MTUM charges 0.15%, so EDV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EDV vs MTUM: how they differ

EDV and MTUM hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MTUM returned more over the year.

Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury Index Fund and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EDV and MTUM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EDV	Only in MTUM
United States Treasury Strip Coupon 1.82%	ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 5.39%
United States Treasury Strip Principal 1.76%	MICRON TECHNOLOGY 5.20%
United States Treasury Strip Coupon 1.72%	INTEL CORPORATION 4.14%
United States Treasury Strip Principal 1.70%	CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.48%
United States Treasury Strip Coupon 1.68%	JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.38%
United States Treasury Strip Principal 1.65%	SANDISK 3.10%
United States Treasury Strip Coupon 1.60%	APPLIED MATERIAL INC 2.87%
United States Treasury Strip Principal 1.57%	ALPHABET CLASS A 2.69%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

EDV and MTUM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EDV Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury Index Fund	MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Vanguard	iShares
What it is	Extended Duration Treasury	MSCI USA Momentum Factor
Total return, 1 year	−10.8%	+21.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−28.3 pts	+4.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.05%	0.15%
Holdings	82	128

EDV in plain words

EDV is a bond fund tracking the Extended Duration Treasury. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −10.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 57.3% below its high of Mar 9, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.

MTUM in plain words

MTUM is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 128 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%. It sat 11.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EDV or MTUM?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EDV returned −10.8% and MTUM returned +21.8%, so MTUM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EDV or MTUM?: EDV charges 0.05% a year and MTUM charges 0.15%, so EDV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EDV against MTUM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EDV against MTUM, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/edv-vs-mtum Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources