Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EDV vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EDV returned −13.3% to MTUM's +18.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EDV and MTUM

Net assets: $3.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF, and $18.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF.

At a glance
−13.3%
EDV total return, 1 year
+18.4%
MTUM total return, 1 year
0.05%
EDV expense ratio
0.15%
MTUM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

EDV costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 31.7 points; MTUM is 5.7 times larger.

EDV vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEDVMTUM
Return
Total return, 1 year−13.3%+18.4%
Drawdown
Below its high57.0%, high on Mar 9, 202011.9%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Treasury STRIPS 2030 Year Equal Par Bond IndexMSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.05%0.15%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$3.6bn$20.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight93%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund35.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EDV and MTUM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EDV MTUM
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EDV
United States Treasury Strip Principal 1.91%
United States Treasury Strip Principal 1.84%
United States Treasury Strip Principal 1.73%
United States Treasury Strip Coupon 1.62%
United States Treasury Strip Coupon 1.62%
United States Treasury Strip Coupon 1.61%
United States Treasury Strip Coupon 1.60%
United States Treasury Strip Coupon 1.59%
Only in MTUM
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 6.06%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 5.00%
INTEL CORPORATION 3.92%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.64%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.45%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.96%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS 2.88%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.62%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EDV Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Extended Duration Treasury Tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor
Total return, 1 year −13.3% +18.4%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.6% (MLRG)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +4.8 pts vs MLRG
Expense ratio 0.05% 0.15%
Holdings 81 126
Net assets, EDV as of Sep 30, 2026 and MTUM as of Oct 27, 2026 $3.6bn $18.7bn

EDV and MTUM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

MTUM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EDV

EDV tracks an index of Extended Duration Treasury. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −13.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 57.0% below its high of Mar 9, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

MTUM

MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 35.5%. It sat 11.9% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EDV or MTUM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EDV returned −13.3% and MTUM +18.4%.
Which is cheaper, EDV or MTUM?
EDV is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EDV against MTUM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/edv-vs-mtum

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.