Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DVY vs NOBL: how they differ

DVY and NOBL hold 16% of their weight in the same names, and DVY returned more over the year.

iShares Select Dividend ETF and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DVY and NOBL hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DVY and NOBL both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDVYNOBL
TARGET CORP1.69%1.64%
CHEVRON1.48%1.61%
GENUINE PARTS1.39%1.61%
T ROWE PRICE GROUP2.06%1.33%
ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND1.33%1.44%
KIMBERLY CLARK1.47%1.31%
EVERSOURCE ENERGY1.31%1.34%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP1.04%1.56%
COCA-COLA1.00%1.56%
FRANKLIN TEMPLETON0.92%1.51%
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES0.82%1.72%
NEXTERA ENERGY0.81%1.34%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DVYOnly in NOBL
HP INC 2.46%BECTON DICKINSON AND CO 1.69%
PFIZER 2.24%ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY-CL A 1.69%
PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL INC 2.17%ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC 1.68%
ALTRIA GROUP INC 2.12%MEDTRONIC PLC 1.61%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC 1.87%AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING 1.60%
ONEOK 1.85%NUCOR CORP 1.60%
FORD MOTOR CO 1.55%EMERSON ELECTRIC CO 1.58%
GENERAL MILLS INC 1.51%EXPEDITORS INTL WASH INC 1.58%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.

DVY and NOBL on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DVY
iShares Select Dividend ETF
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesProShares
What it isUS dividendS&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats
Total return, 1 year+18.0%+9.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.5 pts−8.1 pts
Expense ratio0.38%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50080.5%100.0%
Holdings10169

DVY in plain words

DVY is an index equity fund tracking the US dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.38% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 80% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 19.5%.

NOBL in plain words

NOBL is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 11, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 16.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DVY or NOBL?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DVY returned +18.0% and NOBL returned +9.4%, so DVY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DVY or NOBL?
DVY charges 0.38% a year and NOBL charges 0.35%, so NOBL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DVY and NOBL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 80% of DVY and 100% of NOBL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 16% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DVY against NOBL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DVY against NOBL, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dvy-vs-nobl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources