Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DVY vs MTUM: how they differ

DVY and MTUM hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and MTUM returned more over the year.

iShares Select Dividend ETF and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DVY and MTUM hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DVY and MTUM both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDVYMTUM
CHEVRON1.48%1.52%
MERCK & CO INC1.12%1.83%
VALERO ENERGY CORP1.36%1.10%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP1.04%2.69%
COCA-COLA1.00%1.89%
CVS HEALTH1.37%0.75%
EOG RESOURCES1.28%0.43%
TARGET CORP1.69%0.41%
ENTERGY CORP0.82%0.19%
ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND1.33%0.18%
HP INC2.46%0.16%
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC1.38%0.13%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DVYOnly in MTUM
PFIZER 2.24%ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 5.39%
PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL INC 2.17%MICRON TECHNOLOGY 5.20%
ALTRIA GROUP INC 2.12%INTEL CORPORATION 4.14%
T ROWE PRICE GROUP 2.06%CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.48%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC 1.87%JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.38%
ONEOK 1.85%SANDISK 3.10%
FORD MOTOR CO 1.55%APPLIED MATERIAL INC 2.87%
GENERAL MILLS INC 1.51%ALPHABET CLASS A 2.69%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

DVY and MTUM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DVY
iShares Select Dividend ETF
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isUS dividendMSCI USA Momentum Factor
Total return, 1 year+18.0%+21.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.5 pts+4.3 pts
Expense ratio0.38%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50080.5%98.2%
Holdings101128

DVY in plain words

DVY is an index equity fund tracking the US dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.38% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 80% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 19.5%.

MTUM in plain words

MTUM is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 128 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%. It sat 11.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DVY or MTUM?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DVY returned +18.0% and MTUM returned +21.8%, so MTUM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DVY or MTUM?
DVY charges 0.38% a year and MTUM charges 0.15%, so MTUM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DVY and MTUM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 80% of DVY and 98% of MTUM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DVY against MTUM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DVY against MTUM, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dvy-vs-mtum Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources