Which returned more over the last year, CTA or SIVR?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CTA returned +17.0% and SIVR returned +54.2%, so SIVR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, CTA or SIVR?

CTA charges 0.75% a year and SIVR charges 0.45%, so SIVR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CTA vs SIVR: how they differ

CTA is an equity index fund and SIVR a commodity fund, and over the year SIVR returned more, +54.2% against +17.0%.

Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF.

CTA and SIVR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF	SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Simplify	abrdn
What it is	Simplify Managed Futures Strategy	Physical Silver
Total return, 1 year	+17.0%	+54.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−0.5 pts	+36.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.75%	0.45%
Holdings	10	not filed

CTA in plain words

CTA is an index equity fund tracking the Simplify Managed Futures Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%. It sat 5.3% below its high of May 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SIVR in plain words

SIVR is a commodity fund tracking the Physical Silver. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +54.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.45% a year. It sat 44.9% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CTA or SIVR?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CTA returned +17.0% and SIVR returned +54.2%, so SIVR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CTA or SIVR?: CTA charges 0.75% a year and SIVR charges 0.45%, so SIVR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CTA against SIVR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CTA against SIVR, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cta-vs-sivr Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources