Data as of Sep 21, 2026.
BSV vs FBTC: how they differ
BSV is a bond index fund and FBTC a spot crypto ETP, and over the year BSV returned more, +1.1% against −31.0%.
Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund.
| BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF | FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core fund | Core fund |
| Issuer | Vanguard | Fidelity |
| What it is | Tracks an index of Short-Term Bond | Holds bitcoin |
| Total return, 1 year | +1.1% | −31.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −15.5 pts | −47.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.25% |
| Holdings | 3177 | not filed |
| Net assets | $46.6bn | $13.9bn |
BSV in plain words
BSV tracks an index of Short-Term Bond. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
FBTC in plain words
FBTC holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BSV or FBTC?
- In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and FBTC returned −31.0%, so BSV returned more.
- Which is cheaper, BSV or FBTC?
- BSV charges 0.03% a year and FBTC charges 0.25%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BSV against FBTC, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsv-vs-fbtc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources