Which returned more over the last year, BSV or ETHA?

In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and ETHA returned −42.6%, so BSV returned more.

Which is cheaper, BSV or ETHA?

BSV charges 0.03% a year and ETHA charges 0.25%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 21, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BSV vs ETHA: how they differ

BSV and ETHA hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and BSV returned more over the year.

Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF and iShares Ethereum Trust ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BSV and ETHA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions BSV and ETHA both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding	BSV	ETHA
US Dollar	0.21%	0.00%

Only in each
Only in BSV	Only in ETHA
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.98%	ETHER 100.00%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.10%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.87%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.85%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.81%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.80%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.79%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.78%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

BSV and ETHA on the fields both publish, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF	ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF
Where it sits	Core fund	Core fund
Issuer	Vanguard	iShares
What it is	Tracks an index of Short-Term Bond	Holds ether
Total return, 1 year	+1.1%	−42.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	−15.5 pts	−59.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.03%	0.25%
Holdings	3177	2
Net assets	$46.6bn	$9.2bn

BSV in plain words

BSV tracks an index of Short-Term Bond. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

ETHA in plain words

ETHA holds ether. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −42.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 45.6% below its high of Aug 22, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSV or ETHA?: In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and ETHA returned −42.6%, so BSV returned more.
Which is cheaper, BSV or ETHA?: BSV charges 0.03% a year and ETHA charges 0.25%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BSV against ETHA, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BSV against ETHA, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsv-vs-etha Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources