Data as of Sep 19, 2026.
AGG vs ETHA: how they differ
AGG and ETHA hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and AGG returned more over the year.
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF and iShares Ethereum Trust ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, AGG and ETHA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | AGG | ETHA |
|---|---|---|
| USD CASH | -1.99% | 0.00% |
| Only in AGG | Only in ETHA |
|---|---|
| BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 2.73% | ETHER 100.00% |
| TREASURY NOTE (OLD) 0.40% | |
| TREASURY NOTE 0.40% | |
| TREASURY NOTE 0.40% | |
| TREASURY NOTE 0.40% | |
| TREASURY NOTE 0.40% | |
| TREASURY NOTE 0.39% | |
| TREASURY NOTE 0.39% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
| AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core fund | Core fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds | Holds ether |
| Total return, 1 year | −0.4% | −42.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −17.0 pts | −59.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.25% |
| Holdings | 13428 | 2 |
| Net assets | $137.3bn | $9.2bn |
AGG in plain words
AGG tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 18, 2026.
ETHA in plain words
ETHA holds ether. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −42.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 45.6% below its high of Aug 22, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AGG or ETHA?
- In the year to Sep 19, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned −0.4% and ETHA returned −42.6%, so AGG returned more.
- Which is cheaper, AGG or ETHA?
- AGG charges 0.03% a year and ETHA charges 0.25%, so AGG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AGG against ETHA, data as of Sep 19, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-etha Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources