Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 19, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AGG vs ETHA: how they differ

AGG and ETHA hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and AGG returned more over the year.

iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF and iShares Ethereum Trust ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AGG and ETHA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AGG and ETHA both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAGGETHA
USD CASH-1.99%0.00%
Only in each
Only in AGGOnly in ETHA
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 2.73%ETHER 100.00%
TREASURY NOTE (OLD) 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.39%
TREASURY NOTE 0.39%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

AGG and ETHA on the fields both publish, as of Sep 19, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
ETHA
iShares Ethereum Trust ETF
Where it sitsCore fundCore fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isTracks an index of US aggregate bondsHolds ether
Total return, 1 year−0.4%−42.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+16.6%+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500−17.0 pts−59.2 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.25%
Holdings134282
Net assets$137.3bn$9.2bn

AGG in plain words

AGG tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 18, 2026.

ETHA in plain words

ETHA holds ether. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −42.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 45.6% below its high of Aug 22, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AGG or ETHA?
In the year to Sep 19, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned −0.4% and ETHA returned −42.6%, so AGG returned more.
Which is cheaper, AGG or ETHA?
AGG charges 0.03% a year and ETHA charges 0.25%, so AGG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AGG against ETHA, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 19, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AGG against ETHA, data as of Sep 19, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-etha Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources