Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or FBTC?

In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +20.8% and FBTC returned −31.0%, so ACWX returned more.

Which is cheaper, ACWX or FBTC?

ACWX charges 0.32% a year and FBTC charges 0.25%, so FBTC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 21, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWX vs FBTC: how they differ

ACWX is an equity index fund and FBTC a spot crypto ETP, and over the year ACWX returned more, +20.8% against −31.0%.

iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund.

ACWX and FBTC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF	FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund
Where it sits	Core fund	Core fund
Issuer	iShares	Fidelity
What it is	Tracks the MSCI ACWI ex U.S.	Holds bitcoin
Total return, 1 year	+20.8%	−31.0%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	+4.3 pts	−47.6 pts
Expense ratio	0.32%	0.25%
Holdings	1911	not filed
Net assets	$12.3bn	$13.9bn

ACWX in plain words

ACWX tracks the MSCI ACWI ex U.S.. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1911 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%.

FBTC in plain words

FBTC holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or FBTC?: In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +20.8% and FBTC returned −31.0%, so ACWX returned more.
Which is cheaper, ACWX or FBTC?: ACWX charges 0.32% a year and FBTC charges 0.25%, so FBTC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWX against FBTC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWX against FBTC, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwx-vs-fbtc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources