Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or IBIT?

In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +17.6% and IBIT returned −31.1%, so ACWI returned more.

Which is cheaper, ACWI or IBIT?

ACWI charges 0.32% a year and IBIT charges 0.25%, so IBIT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 21, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWI vs IBIT: how they differ

ACWI and IBIT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ACWI returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and IBIT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ACWI and IBIT both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding	ACWI	IBIT
USD CASH	0.00%	0.00%

Only in each
Only in ACWI	Only in IBIT
NVIDIA 4.99%	BITCOIN 100.00%
APPLE 4.82%
MICROSOFT 3.40%
AMAZON.COM INC 2.40%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.01%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 1.86%
ALPHABET CLASS C 1.57%
BROADCOM INC 1.57%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

ACWI and IBIT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
Where it sits	Core fund	Core fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	Tracks the MSCI ACWI	Holds bitcoin
Total return, 1 year	+17.6%	−31.1%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	+1.0 pts	−47.6 pts
Expense ratio	0.32%	0.25%
Holdings	2238	2
Net assets	$33.0bn	$63.7bn

ACWI in plain words

ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2238 positions, with the top ten at 25.2%.

IBIT in plain words

IBIT holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.1% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or IBIT?: In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +17.6% and IBIT returned −31.1%, so ACWI returned more.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or IBIT?: ACWI charges 0.32% a year and IBIT charges 0.25%, so IBIT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWI against IBIT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against IBIT, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-ibit Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources