Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

XBI vs XLV: how they differ

XBI and XLV hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and XBI returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Biotech ETF and State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, XBI and XLV hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions XBI and XLV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingXBIXLV
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc1.06%2.20%
AbbVie Inc1.04%7.76%
Amgen Inc1.00%3.41%
Gilead Sciences Inc0.97%2.74%
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc0.96%1.09%
Biogen Inc1.03%0.56%
Moderna Inc1.41%0.43%
Incyte Corp1.00%0.33%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in XBIOnly in XLV
Apogee Therapeutics Inc 1.49%Eli Lilly & Co 16.56%
Twist Bioscience Corp 1.41%Johnson & Johnson 10.67%
Oruka Therapeutics Inc 1.38%UnitedHealth Group Inc 6.59%
Kymera Therapeutics Inc 1.36%Merck & Co Inc 5.54%
Viking Therapeutics Inc 1.31%Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 3.25%
Praxis Precision Medicines Inc 1.29%Abbott Laboratories 2.76%
Erasca Inc 1.27%Intuitive Surgical Inc 2.46%
Revolution Medicines Inc 1.21%Pfizer Inc 2.40%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

XBI and XLV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
XBI
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Biotech ETF
XLV
State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetState Street
What it isSPDR S&P BiotechHealth care
Total return, 1 year+64.0%+20.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+46.5 pts+2.9 pts
Expense ratio0.35%0.08%
Already in the S&P 5008.5%100.0%
Holdings15059

XBI in plain words

XBI is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Biotech. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +64.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 8% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 150 positions, with the top ten at 13.3%. It sat 9.6% below its high of Feb 8, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLV in plain words

XLV is an index equity fund tracking the Health care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 59 positions, with the top ten at 61.7%. It sat 5.9% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, XBI or XLV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, XBI returned +64.0% and XLV returned +20.4%, so XBI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, XBI or XLV?
XBI charges 0.35% a year and XLV charges 0.08%, so XLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do XBI and XLV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 8% of XBI and 100% of XLV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

XBI against XLV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, XBI against XLV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/XBI-XLV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources