Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VTI vs XSD

Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Semiconductor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VTI and XSD hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VTI and XSD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVTIXSD
Broadcom Inc2.48%2.13%
NVIDIA Corp6.37%2.10%
Micron Technology Inc1.80%2.73%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc1.31%2.71%
Intel Corp0.78%2.75%
Texas Instruments Inc0.38%2.22%
Marvell Technology Inc0.37%2.49%
QUALCOMM Inc0.27%2.04%
Analog Devices Inc0.27%2.13%
Astera Labs Inc0.10%3.08%
Monolithic Power Systems Inc0.09%1.97%
Microchip Technology Inc0.07%2.19%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VTIOnly in XSD
Apple Inc 5.88%Ambarella Inc 2.89%
Microsoft Corp 3.84%Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 2.42%
Amazon.com Inc 3.19%NXP Semiconductors NV 2.07%
Alphabet Inc 2.90%Alpha & Omega Semiconductor Ltd 1.87%
Alphabet Inc 2.29%
Meta Platforms Inc 1.71%
Tesla Inc 1.64%
Eli Lilly & Co 1.41%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026.

VTI and XSD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund
XSD
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Semiconductor ETF
Where it sitsCore fundThemes desk
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isUS total marketSemiconductors
Total return, 1 year+20.0%+71.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+20.0%+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.0 pts+51.8 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50088.3%33.4%
Holdings353147

VTI in plain words

VTI is a index equity fund tracking US total market. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +20.0% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3531 positions, with the top ten at 32.1%.

XSD in plain words

By weight, 33% of XSD's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 89%. The top ten holdings are 29% of the fund across 47 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +71.8% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 51.8 pts. It sits 24.3% below its all-time high of Jun 3, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VTI or XSD?
In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VTI returned +20.0% and XSD returned +71.8%, so XSD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VTI or XSD?
VTI charges 0.03% a year and XSD charges 0.35%, so VTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VTI and XSD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of VTI and 33% of XSD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 10% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Are VTI and XSD the same kind of fund?
No. VTI is an index ETF and XSD is a thematic ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VTI against XSD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VTI against XSD, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VTI-XSD.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources