Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VTI vs VTWO: how they differ

VTI and VTWO hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and VTWO returned more over the year.

Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund and Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VTI and VTWO hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VTI and VTWO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVTIVTWO
Bloom Energy Corp0.11%1.83%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd0.06%1.12%
Sterling Infrastructure Inc0.03%0.76%
Fabrinet0.03%0.69%
TTM Technologies Inc0.03%0.52%
Guardant Health Inc0.03%0.47%
IonQ Inc0.03%0.63%
Nextpower Inc0.02%0.67%
SiTime Corp0.02%0.47%
Coeur Mining Inc0.02%0.58%
Dycom Industries Inc0.02%0.44%
Semtech Corp0.02%0.42%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VTIOnly in VTWO
NVIDIA Corp 6.37%Clearwater Analytics Holdings Inc 0.20%
Apple Inc 5.88%SSR Mining Inc 0.19%
Microsoft Corp 3.84%Garrett Motion Inc 0.17%
Amazon.com Inc 3.19%Kulicke & Soffa Industries Inc 0.15%
Alphabet Inc 2.90%CRISPR Therapeutics AG 0.15%
Broadcom Inc 2.48%Brookfield Infrastructure Corp 0.15%
Alphabet Inc 2.29%Golar LNG Ltd 0.14%
Micron Technology Inc 1.80%Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc 0.14%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VTI and VTWO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isUS total marketRussell 2000
Total return, 1 year+17.2%+21.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.3 pts+3.9 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50088.3%0.5%
Holdings35311951

VTI in plain words

VTI is an index equity fund tracking the US total market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3531 positions, with the top ten at 32.1%.

VTWO in plain words

VTWO is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1951 positions, with the top ten at 7.8%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VTI or VTWO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VTI returned +17.2% and VTWO returned +21.4%, so VTWO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VTI or VTWO?
VTI charges 0.03% a year and VTWO charges 0.07%, so VTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VTI and VTWO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of VTI and 0% of VTWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VTI against VTWO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VTI against VTWO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VTI-VTWO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources