Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VT vs XLI: how they differ

VT and XLI hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and VT returned more over the year.

Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund and State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VT and XLI hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VT and XLI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVTXLI
Caterpillar Inc0.37%8.52%
General Electric Co0.27%6.77%
GE Vernova Inc0.26%5.48%
RTX Corp0.21%4.44%
Boeing Co/The0.16%2.96%
Union Pacific Corp0.14%2.81%
Uber Technologies Inc0.14%2.55%
Deere & Co0.13%2.77%
Vertiv Holdings Co0.11%2.23%
Parker-Hannifin Corp0.10%2.14%
Quanta Services Inc0.10%1.88%
Lockheed Martin Corp0.10%1.79%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VTOnly in XLI
NVIDIA Corp 4.22%Eaton Corp PLC 2.87%
Apple Inc 3.53%Trane Technologies PLC 1.89%
Microsoft Corp 2.73%Johnson Controls International plc 1.55%
Amazon.com Inc 2.29%Honeywell International Inc 1.23%
Alphabet Inc 2.04%Honeywell Aerospace Inc 1.22%
Broadcom Inc 1.74%Fedex Freight Holding Co Inc 0.28%
Alphabet Inc 1.61%Pentair PLC 0.21%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 1.52%Allegion plc 0.21%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

VT and XLI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
XLI
State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isTotal World StockIndustrials
Total return, 1 year+18.9%+14.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.4 pts−3.3 pts
Expense ratio0.06%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50055.2%100.0%
Holdings1004281

VT in plain words

VT is an index equity fund tracking the Total World Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10042 positions, with the top ten at 21.9%.

XLI in plain words

XLI is an index equity fund tracking the Industrials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 81 positions, with the top ten at 41.4%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VT or XLI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VT returned +18.9% and XLI returned +14.3%, so VT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VT or XLI?
VT charges 0.06% a year and XLI charges 0.08%, so VT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VT and XLI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 55% of VT and 100% of XLI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VT against XLI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VT against XLI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VT-XLI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources