Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VT vs XHB: how they differ

VT and XHB hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and VT returned more over the year.

Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Homebuilders ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VT and XHB hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VT and XHB both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVTXHB
Home Depot Inc/The0.29%3.28%
Lowe's Cos Inc0.12%3.03%
Carrier Global Corp0.05%3.20%
DR Horton Inc0.04%3.29%
PulteGroup Inc0.02%3.44%
Williams-Sonoma Inc0.02%3.34%
Lennar Corp0.02%2.99%
NVR Inc0.02%3.21%
Lennox International Inc0.02%3.37%
Masco Corp0.02%3.41%
Tempur Sealy International Inc0.01%3.40%
Carlisle Cos Inc0.01%3.28%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VTOnly in XHB
NVIDIA Corp 4.22%Trane Technologies PLC 3.25%
Apple Inc 3.53%Allegion plc 3.22%
Microsoft Corp 2.73%Johnson Controls International plc 3.11%
Amazon.com Inc 2.29%LGI Homes Inc 1.19%
Alphabet Inc 2.04%Hovnanian Enterprises Inc 0.65%
Broadcom Inc 1.74%Beazer Homes USA Inc 0.64%
Alphabet Inc 1.61%Dream Finders Homes Inc 0.52%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 1.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

VT and XHB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
XHB
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Homebuilders ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isTotal World StockSPDR S&P Homebuilders
Total return, 1 year+18.9%−16.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.4 pts−34.1 pts
Expense ratio0.06%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50055.2%45.7%
Holdings1004235

VT in plain words

VT is an index equity fund tracking the Total World Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10042 positions, with the top ten at 21.9%.

XHB in plain words

XHB is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Homebuilders. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 46% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 35 positions, with the top ten at 35.6%. It sat 20.6% below its high of Oct 18, 2024 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VT or XHB?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VT returned +18.9% and XHB returned −16.6%, so VT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VT or XHB?
VT charges 0.06% a year and XHB charges 0.35%, so VT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VT and XHB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 55% of VT and 46% of XHB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VT against XHB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VT against XHB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VT-XHB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources