Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VT vs XBI: how they differ

VT and XBI hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and XBI returned more over the year.

Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Biotech ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VT and XBI hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VT and XBI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVTXBI
AbbVie Inc0.34%1.04%
Amgen Inc0.17%1.00%
Gilead Sciences Inc0.15%0.97%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc0.10%1.06%
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc0.07%0.96%
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc0.04%0.96%
Biogen Inc0.03%1.03%
Insmed Inc0.03%1.08%
Natera Inc0.03%1.17%
REVOLUTION Medicines Inc0.02%1.21%
United Therapeutics Corp0.02%0.93%
Incyte Corp0.01%1.00%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VTOnly in XBI
NVIDIA Corp 4.22%Apogee Therapeutics Inc 1.49%
Apple Inc 3.53%Oruka Therapeutics Inc 1.38%
Microsoft Corp 2.73%Erasca Inc 1.27%
Amazon.com Inc 2.29%CG oncology Inc 1.20%
Alphabet Inc 2.04%SELLAS Life Sciences Group Inc 1.19%
Broadcom Inc 1.74%Dianthus Therapeutics Inc 1.19%
Alphabet Inc 1.61%Mirum Pharmaceuticals Inc 1.16%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 1.52%Roivant Sciences Ltd 1.16%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

VT and XBI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
XBI
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Biotech ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isTotal World StockSPDR S&P Biotech
Total return, 1 year+18.9%+64.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.4 pts+46.5 pts
Expense ratio0.06%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50055.2%8.5%
Holdings10042150

VT in plain words

VT is an index equity fund tracking the Total World Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10042 positions, with the top ten at 21.9%.

XBI in plain words

XBI is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Biotech. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +64.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 8% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 150 positions, with the top ten at 13.3%. It sat 9.6% below its high of Feb 8, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VT or XBI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VT returned +18.9% and XBI returned +64.0%, so XBI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VT or XBI?
VT charges 0.06% a year and XBI charges 0.35%, so VT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VT and XBI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 55% of VT and 8% of XBI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VT against XBI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VT against XBI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VT-XBI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources