Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VT vs VTWO: how they differ

VT and VTWO hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and VTWO returned more over the year.

Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund and Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VT and VTWO hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VT and VTWO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVTVTWO
Bloom Energy Corp0.06%1.83%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd0.03%1.12%
Fabrinet0.02%0.69%
Coeur Mining Inc0.02%0.58%
Nextpower Inc0.02%0.67%
EchoStar Corp0.01%0.52%
IonQ Inc0.01%0.63%
Sterling Infrastructure Inc0.01%0.76%
TTM Technologies Inc0.01%0.52%
Advanced Energy Industries Inc0.01%0.34%
Modine Manufacturing Co0.01%0.43%
Dycom Industries Inc0.01%0.44%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VTOnly in VTWO
NVIDIA Corp 4.22%Applied Optoelectronics Inc 0.31%
Apple Inc 3.53%Argan Inc 0.26%
Microsoft Corp 2.73%Powell Industries Inc 0.24%
Amazon.com Inc 2.29%MYR Group Inc 0.21%
Alphabet Inc 2.04%Kodiak Gas Services Inc 0.18%
Broadcom Inc 1.74%Garrett Motion Inc 0.17%
Alphabet Inc 1.61%Spyre Therapeutics Inc 0.16%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 1.52%Navitas Semiconductor Corp 0.16%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VT and VTWO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isTotal World StockRussell 2000
Total return, 1 year+18.9%+21.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.4 pts+3.9 pts
Expense ratio0.06%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50055.2%0.5%
Holdings100421951

VT in plain words

VT is an index equity fund tracking the Total World Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10042 positions, with the top ten at 21.9%.

VTWO in plain words

VTWO is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1951 positions, with the top ten at 7.8%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VT or VTWO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VT returned +18.9% and VTWO returned +21.4%, so VTWO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VT or VTWO?
VT charges 0.06% a year and VTWO charges 0.07%, so VT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VT and VTWO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 55% of VT and 0% of VTWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VT against VTWO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VT against VTWO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VT-VTWO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources