Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VOX vs XLC: how they differ

VOX and XLC hold 80% of their weight in the same names, and VOX returned more over the year.

Vanguard Communication Services Index Fund and State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VOX and XLC hold 80% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VOX and XLC both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVOXXLC
Meta Platforms Inc21.12%19.93%
Alphabet Inc16.14%13.10%
Alphabet Inc10.61%10.44%
Netflix Inc4.77%4.84%
Verizon Communications Inc4.17%4.15%
Walt Disney Co/The3.96%4.49%
AT&T Inc3.69%4.10%
Warner Bros Discovery Inc2.74%4.67%
T-Mobile US Inc2.50%4.16%
Comcast Corp2.36%4.71%
Take-Two Interactive Software Inc2.09%5.26%
Electronic Arts Inc2.00%4.64%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VOXOnly in XLC
AST SpaceMobile Inc 1.42%
ROBLOX Corp 1.37%
Liberty Media Corp-Liberty Formula One 1.16%
Reddit Inc 1.07%
Roku Inc 1.02%
Pinterest Inc 0.72%
New York Times Co/The 0.70%
Lumen Technologies Inc 0.65%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VOX and XLC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VOX
Vanguard Communication Services Index Fund
XLC
State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isCommunication ServicesCommunication services
Total return, 1 year+2.9%−2.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−14.6 pts−19.5 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50084.5%100.0%
Holdings11423

VOX in plain words

VOX is an index equity fund tracking the Communication Services. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 114 positions, with the top ten at 72.1%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLC in plain words

XLC is an index equity fund tracking the Communication services. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 23 positions, with the top ten at 76.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Jan 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VOX or XLC?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VOX returned +2.9% and XLC returned −2.0%, so VOX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VOX or XLC?
VOX charges 0.09% a year and XLC charges 0.08%, so XLC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VOX and XLC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of VOX and 100% of XLC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 80% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VOX against XLC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VOX against XLC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VOX-XLC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources