Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
VOX vs VTWO: how they differ
VOX and VTWO hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and VTWO returned more over the year.
Vanguard Communication Services Index Fund and Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, VOX and VTWO hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | VOX | VTWO |
|---|---|---|
| EchoStar Corp | 1.09% | 0.52% |
| Lumen Technologies Inc | 0.65% | 0.31% |
| Globalstar Inc | 0.26% | 0.12% |
| Telephone and Data Systems Inc | 0.24% | 0.11% |
| Sphere Entertainment Co | 0.21% | 0.11% |
| Cinemark Holdings Inc | 0.18% | 0.09% |
| Lionsgate Studios Corp | 0.17% | 0.09% |
| Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp | 0.16% | 0.08% |
| Cargurus Inc | 0.15% | 0.07% |
| Atlanta Braves Holdings Inc | 0.14% | 0.07% |
| Magnite Inc | 0.12% | 0.06% |
| Uniti Group Inc | 0.10% | 0.06% |
| Only in VOX | Only in VTWO |
|---|---|
| Meta Platforms Inc 21.12% | Bloom Energy Corp 1.83% |
| Alphabet Inc 16.14% | Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 1.12% |
| Alphabet Inc 10.61% | Sterling Infrastructure Inc 0.76% |
| Netflix Inc 4.77% | Fabrinet 0.69% |
| Verizon Communications Inc 4.17% | Nextpower Inc 0.67% |
| Walt Disney Co/The 3.96% | IonQ Inc 0.63% |
| AT&T Inc 3.69% | Coeur Mining Inc 0.58% |
| Warner Bros Discovery Inc 2.74% | TTM Technologies Inc 0.52% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
| VOX Vanguard Communication Services Index Fund | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Vanguard | Vanguard |
| What it is | Communication Services | Russell 2000 |
| Total return, 1 year | +2.9% | +21.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −14.6 pts | +3.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.09% | 0.07% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 84.5% | 0.5% |
| Holdings | 114 | 1951 |
VOX in plain words
VOX is an index equity fund tracking the Communication Services. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 114 positions, with the top ten at 72.1%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VTWO in plain words
VTWO is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1951 positions, with the top ten at 7.8%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, VOX or VTWO?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VOX returned +2.9% and VTWO returned +21.4%, so VTWO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, VOX or VTWO?
- VOX charges 0.09% a year and VTWO charges 0.07%, so VTWO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do VOX and VTWO overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 84% of VOX and 0% of VTWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, VOX against VTWO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VOX-VTWO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources