Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VOOG vs XOVR: how they differ

VOOG and XOVR hold 23% of their weight in the same names, and VOOG returned more over the year.

Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VOOG and XOVR hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VOOG and XOVR both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVOOGXOVR
NVIDIA Corp14.29%9.48%
Alphabet Inc6.17%6.53%
Meta Platforms Inc3.85%4.47%
Tesla Inc2.12%1.63%
Palantir Technologies Inc1.00%0.56%
AppLovin Corp0.46%3.95%
Arista Networks Inc0.46%2.31%
Monolithic Power Systems Inc0.21%1.77%
Robinhood Markets Inc0.21%3.56%
DoorDash Inc0.17%2.04%
Axon Enterprise Inc0.07%2.60%
Veeva Systems Inc0.04%3.17%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VOOGOnly in XOVR
Microsoft Corp 9.31%Astera Labs Inc 7.75%
Apple Inc 6.38%Natera Inc 3.70%
Broadcom Inc 5.90%Reddit Inc 2.78%
Alphabet Inc 4.90%Affirm Holdings Inc 2.64%
Amazon.com Inc 3.90%Rocket Lab Corp 2.50%
Micron Technology Inc 3.04%Mongodb Inc 2.29%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.44%Roku Inc 2.16%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.42%Tempus Ai Inc 2.06%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VOOG and XOVR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund
XOVR
ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardERShares
What it isS&P 500 GrowthPrivate-Public Crossover
Total return, 1 year+17.8%0.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.3 pts−17.5 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.75%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%43.4%
Holdings14632

VOOG in plain words

VOOG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 146 positions, with the top ten at 60.2%.

XOVR in plain words

XOVR is an index equity fund tracking the Private-Public Crossover. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned 0.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 32 positions, with the top ten at 63.1%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Oct 27, 2025 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VOOG or XOVR?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VOOG returned +17.8% and XOVR returned 0.0%, so VOOG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VOOG or XOVR?
VOOG charges 0.05% a year and XOVR charges 0.75%, so VOOG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VOOG and XOVR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of VOOG and 43% of XOVR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 23% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VOOG against XOVR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VOOG against XOVR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VOOG-XOVR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources