Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VOOG vs XLV: how they differ

VOOG and XLV hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and XLV returned more over the year.

Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund and State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VOOG and XLV hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VOOG and XLV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVOOGXLV
Eli Lilly & Co2.44%16.56%
Johnson & Johnson0.89%10.67%
AbbVie Inc0.49%7.76%
Intuitive Surgical Inc0.42%2.46%
Amgen Inc0.34%3.41%
Gilead Sciences Inc0.25%2.74%
HCA Healthcare Inc0.17%1.06%
Boston Scientific Corp0.13%1.11%
IDEXX Laboratories Inc0.12%0.72%
Stryker Corp0.12%1.90%
Edwards Lifesciences Corp0.06%0.91%
Incyte Corp0.04%0.33%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VOOGOnly in XLV
NVIDIA Corp 14.29%UnitedHealth Group Inc 6.59%
Microsoft Corp 9.31%Merck & Co Inc 5.54%
Apple Inc 6.38%Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 3.25%
Alphabet Inc 6.17%Abbott Laboratories 2.76%
Broadcom Inc 5.90%Pfizer Inc 2.40%
Alphabet Inc 4.90%CVS Health Corp 2.30%
Amazon.com Inc 3.90%Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc 2.20%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.85%Danaher Corp 2.10%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VOOG and XLV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund
XLV
State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isS&P 500 GrowthHealth care
Total return, 1 year+17.8%+20.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.3 pts+2.9 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.08%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%100.0%
Holdings14659

VOOG in plain words

VOOG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 146 positions, with the top ten at 60.2%.

XLV in plain words

XLV is an index equity fund tracking the Health care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 59 positions, with the top ten at 61.7%. It sat 5.9% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VOOG or XLV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VOOG returned +17.8% and XLV returned +20.4%, so XLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VOOG or XLV?
VOOG charges 0.05% a year and XLV charges 0.08%, so VOOG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VOOG and XLV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of VOOG and 100% of XLV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VOOG against XLV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VOOG against XLV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VOOG-XLV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources