Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VOOG vs XLK: how they differ

VOOG and XLK hold 51% of their weight in the same names, and XLK returned more over the year.

Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund and State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VOOG and XLK hold 51% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VOOG and XLK both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVOOGXLK
NVIDIA Corp14.29%14.66%
Microsoft Corp9.31%8.38%
Apple Inc6.38%12.86%
Broadcom Inc5.90%5.41%
Micron Technology Inc3.04%5.42%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc2.34%5.28%
Lam Research Corp1.11%3.02%
Palantir Technologies Inc1.00%1.49%
Applied Materials Inc0.99%3.20%
Cisco Systems Inc0.70%2.59%
KLA Corp0.70%2.20%
Sandisk Corp/DE0.70%1.88%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VOOGOnly in XLK
Alphabet Inc 6.17%Intel Corp 3.68%
Alphabet Inc 4.90%Texas Instruments Inc 1.51%
Amazon.com Inc 3.90%Marvell Technology Inc 1.45%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.85%Western Digital Corp 1.23%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.44%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.21%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.42%QUALCOMM Inc 1.09%
Tesla Inc 2.12%Analog Devices Inc 1.08%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.43%Salesforce Inc 0.71%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VOOG and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund
XLK
State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isS&P 500 GrowthTechnology
Total return, 1 year+17.8%+39.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.3 pts+21.7 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.08%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%100.0%
Holdings14674

VOOG in plain words

VOOG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 146 positions, with the top ten at 60.2%.

XLK in plain words

XLK is an index equity fund tracking the Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +39.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 74 positions, with the top ten at 64.5%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VOOG or XLK?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VOOG returned +17.8% and XLK returned +39.2%, so XLK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VOOG or XLK?
VOOG charges 0.05% a year and XLK charges 0.08%, so VOOG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VOOG and XLK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of VOOG and 100% of XLK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 51% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VOOG against XLK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VOOG against XLK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VOOG-XLK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources