Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VOOG vs XLC: how they differ

VOOG and XLC hold 16% of their weight in the same names, and VOOG returned more over the year.

Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund and State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VOOG and XLC hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VOOG and XLC both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVOOGXLC
Alphabet Inc6.17%13.10%
Alphabet Inc4.90%10.44%
Meta Platforms Inc3.85%19.93%
Netflix Inc1.01%4.84%
Electronic Arts Inc0.06%4.64%
Take-Two Interactive Software Inc0.06%5.26%
EchoStar Corp0.05%1.67%
Live Nation Entertainment Inc0.04%3.50%
TKO Group Holdings Inc0.04%1.53%
Fox Corp0.02%1.26%
Fox Corp0.01%0.79%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VOOGOnly in XLC
NVIDIA Corp 14.29%Comcast Corp 4.71%
Microsoft Corp 9.31%Warner Bros Discovery Inc 4.67%
Apple Inc 6.38%Walt Disney Co/The 4.49%
Broadcom Inc 5.90%T-Mobile US Inc 4.16%
Amazon.com Inc 3.90%Verizon Communications Inc 4.15%
Micron Technology Inc 3.04%AT&T Inc 4.10%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.44%Omnicom Group Inc 2.51%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.42%Charter Communications Inc 1.44%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VOOG and XLC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund
XLC
State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isS&P 500 GrowthCommunication services
Total return, 1 year+17.8%−2.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.3 pts−19.5 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.08%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%100.0%
Holdings14623

VOOG in plain words

VOOG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 146 positions, with the top ten at 60.2%.

XLC in plain words

XLC is an index equity fund tracking the Communication services. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 23 positions, with the top ten at 76.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Jan 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VOOG or XLC?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VOOG returned +17.8% and XLC returned −2.0%, so VOOG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VOOG or XLC?
VOOG charges 0.05% a year and XLC charges 0.08%, so VOOG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VOOG and XLC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of VOOG and 100% of XLC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 16% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VOOG against XLC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VOOG against XLC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VOOG-XLC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources