Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VONG vs XOVR: how they differ

VONG and XOVR hold 21% of their weight in the same names, and VONG returned more over the year.

Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VONG and XOVR hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VONG and XOVR both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVONGXOVR
NVIDIA Corp13.09%9.48%
Alphabet Inc3.91%6.53%
Meta Platforms Inc3.20%4.47%
Tesla Inc3.48%1.63%
Palantir Technologies Inc1.03%0.56%
Arista Networks Inc0.50%2.31%
AppLovin Corp0.44%3.95%
Monolithic Power Systems Inc0.22%1.77%
Rocket Lab Corp0.21%2.50%
DoorDash Inc0.18%2.04%
Astera Labs Inc0.13%7.75%
Axon Enterprise Inc0.10%2.60%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VONGOnly in XOVR
Apple Inc 11.97%Virtu Financial Inc 1.86%
Microsoft Corp 8.98%Globus Medical Inc 1.35%
Broadcom Inc 5.78%N/A 0.05%
Amazon.com Inc 5.07%
Alphabet Inc 3.15%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.67%
Visa Inc 1.57%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 1.47%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VONG and XOVR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund
XOVR
ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardERShares
What it isRussell 1000 GrowthPrivate-Public Crossover
Total return, 1 year+7.2%0.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−10.3 pts−17.5 pts
Expense ratio0.07%0.75%
Already in the S&P 50095.6%43.4%
Holdings38732

VONG in plain words

VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XOVR in plain words

XOVR is an index equity fund tracking the Private-Public Crossover. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned 0.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 32 positions, with the top ten at 63.1%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Oct 27, 2025 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VONG or XOVR?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VONG returned +7.2% and XOVR returned 0.0%, so VONG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VONG or XOVR?
VONG charges 0.07% a year and XOVR charges 0.75%, so VONG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VONG and XOVR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of VONG and 43% of XOVR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 21% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VONG against XOVR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VONG against XOVR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VONG-XOVR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources