Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
VONG vs XLI: how they differ
VONG and XLI hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and XLI returned more over the year.
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund and State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, VONG and XLI hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | VONG | XLI |
|---|---|---|
| General Electric Co | 1.02% | 6.77% |
| GE Vernova Inc | 0.79% | 5.48% |
| Uber Technologies Inc | 0.43% | 2.55% |
| Vertiv Holdings Co | 0.36% | 2.23% |
| Howmet Aerospace Inc | 0.31% | 1.87% |
| Automatic Data Processing Inc | 0.25% | 1.55% |
| Quanta Services Inc | 0.24% | 1.88% |
| Waste Management Inc | 0.24% | 1.43% |
| Comfort Systems USA Inc | 0.19% | 1.21% |
| Cintas Corp | 0.18% | 1.00% |
| Caterpillar Inc | 0.15% | 8.52% |
| WW Grainger Inc | 0.14% | 1.03% |
| Only in VONG | Only in XLI |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 13.09% | RTX Corp 4.44% |
| Apple Inc 11.97% | Eaton Corp PLC 2.87% |
| Microsoft Corp 8.98% | Deere & Co 2.77% |
| Broadcom Inc 5.78% | Parker-Hannifin Corp 2.14% |
| Amazon.com Inc 5.07% | Trane Technologies PLC 1.89% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.91% | Cummins Inc 1.71% |
| Tesla Inc 3.48% | General Dynamics Corp 1.56% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 3.20% | Johnson Controls International plc 1.55% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund | XLI State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Vanguard | State Street |
| What it is | Russell 1000 Growth | Industrials |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.2% | +14.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −10.3 pts | −3.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 95.6% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 387 | 81 |
VONG in plain words
VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
XLI in plain words
XLI is an index equity fund tracking the Industrials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 81 positions, with the top ten at 41.4%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, VONG or XLI?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VONG returned +7.2% and XLI returned +14.3%, so XLI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, VONG or XLI?
- VONG charges 0.07% a year and XLI charges 0.08%, so VONG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do VONG and XLI overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 96% of VONG and 100% of XLI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, VONG against XLI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VONG-XLI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources