Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VONG vs XLG: how they differ

VONG and XLG hold 70% of their weight in the same names, and XLG returned more over the year.

Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VONG and XLG hold 70% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VONG and XLG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVONGXLG
NVIDIA Corp13.09%13.10%
Apple Inc11.97%10.76%
Microsoft Corp8.98%8.18%
Amazon.com Inc5.07%6.99%
Broadcom Inc5.78%4.85%
Alphabet Inc3.91%6.05%
Meta Platforms Inc3.20%3.61%
Alphabet Inc3.15%4.82%
Tesla Inc3.48%2.90%
Eli Lilly & Co2.67%2.00%
Visa Inc1.57%1.50%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc1.47%1.56%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VONGOnly in XLG
Lam Research Corp 1.21%Berkshire Hathaway Inc. 2.35%
GE Vernova Inc 0.79%JPMorgan Chase & Co. 2.28%
KLA Corp 0.76%Exxon Mobil Corp. 1.74%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 0.68%Johnson & Johnson 1.50%
Amphenol Corp 0.55%Chevron Corp. 0.98%
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 0.55%Cisco Systems, Inc. 0.98%
Arista Networks Inc 0.50%Procter & Gamble Co. (The) 0.92%
AppLovin Corp 0.44%UnitedHealth Group Inc. 0.91%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VONG and XLG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardInvesco
What it isRussell 1000 GrowthS&P 500 top 50
Total return, 1 year+7.2%+12.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−10.3 pts−5.3 pts
Expense ratio0.07%0.20%
Already in the S&P 50095.6%100.0%
Holdings38751

VONG in plain words

VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLG in plain words

XLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VONG or XLG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VONG returned +7.2% and XLG returned +12.2%, so XLG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VONG or XLG?
VONG charges 0.07% a year and XLG charges 0.20%, so VONG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VONG and XLG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of VONG and 100% of XLG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 70% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VONG against XLG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VONG against XLG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VONG-XLG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources