Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
VONG vs XBI: how they differ
VONG and XBI hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and XBI returned more over the year.
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Biotech ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, VONG and XBI hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | VONG | XBI |
|---|---|---|
| AbbVie Inc | 1.16% | 1.04% |
| Amgen Inc | 0.40% | 1.00% |
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc | 0.34% | 1.06% |
| Gilead Sciences Inc | 0.14% | 0.97% |
| Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc | 0.12% | 0.96% |
| Natera Inc | 0.09% | 1.17% |
| Insmed Inc | 0.06% | 1.08% |
| Neurocrine Biosciences Inc | 0.04% | 0.97% |
| Ionis Pharmaceuticals Inc | 0.03% | 1.00% |
| Exelixis Inc | 0.03% | 0.96% |
| Halozyme Therapeutics Inc | 0.02% | 1.03% |
| Incyte Corp | 0.01% | 1.00% |
| Only in VONG | Only in XBI |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 13.09% | Apogee Therapeutics Inc 1.49% |
| Apple Inc 11.97% | Moderna Inc 1.41% |
| Microsoft Corp 8.98% | Twist Bioscience Corp 1.41% |
| Broadcom Inc 5.78% | Oruka Therapeutics Inc 1.38% |
| Amazon.com Inc 5.07% | Kymera Therapeutics Inc 1.36% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.91% | Praxis Precision Medicines Inc 1.29% |
| Tesla Inc 3.48% | Erasca Inc 1.27% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 3.20% | Revolution Medicines Inc 1.21% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund | XBI State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Biotech ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Vanguard | State Street |
| What it is | Russell 1000 Growth | SPDR S&P Biotech |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.2% | +64.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −10.3 pts | +46.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.35% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 95.6% | 8.5% |
| Holdings | 387 | 150 |
VONG in plain words
VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
XBI in plain words
XBI is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Biotech. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +64.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 8% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 150 positions, with the top ten at 13.3%. It sat 9.6% below its high of Feb 8, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, VONG or XBI?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VONG returned +7.2% and XBI returned +64.0%, so XBI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, VONG or XBI?
- VONG charges 0.07% a year and XBI charges 0.35%, so VONG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do VONG and XBI overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 96% of VONG and 8% of XBI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, VONG against XBI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VONG-XBI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources