Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VONG vs VTI: how they differ

VONG and VTI hold 54% of their weight in the same names, and VTI returned more over the year.

Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VONG and VTI hold 54% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VONG and VTI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVONGVTI
NVIDIA Corp13.09%6.37%
Apple Inc11.97%5.88%
Microsoft Corp8.98%3.84%
Amazon.com Inc5.07%3.19%
Alphabet Inc3.91%2.90%
Broadcom Inc5.78%2.48%
Alphabet Inc3.15%2.29%
Meta Platforms Inc3.20%1.71%
Tesla Inc3.48%1.64%
Eli Lilly & Co2.67%1.41%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc1.47%1.31%
Visa Inc1.57%0.77%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VONGOnly in VTI
Spotify Technology SA 0.23%Micron Technology Inc 1.80%
NU Holdings Ltd/Cayman Islands 0.13%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.25%
Coupang Inc 0.07%JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.12%
Restaurant Brands International Inc 0.05%Johnson & Johnson 0.85%
Viking Holdings Ltd 0.05%Exxon Mobil Corp 0.79%
On Holding AG 0.03%Intel Corp 0.78%
Masimo Corp 0.02%Cisco Systems Inc 0.58%
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd 0.02%UnitedHealth Group Inc 0.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VONG and VTI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isRussell 1000 GrowthUS total market
Total return, 1 year+7.2%+17.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−10.3 pts−0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.07%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50095.6%88.3%
Holdings3873531

VONG in plain words

VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VTI in plain words

VTI is an index equity fund tracking the US total market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3531 positions, with the top ten at 32.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VONG or VTI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VONG returned +7.2% and VTI returned +17.2%, so VTI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VONG or VTI?
VONG charges 0.07% a year and VTI charges 0.03%, so VTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VONG and VTI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of VONG and 88% of VTI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 54% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VONG against VTI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VONG against VTI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VONG-VTI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources