Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
VONG vs VOX: how they differ
VONG and VOX hold 12% of their weight in the same names, and VONG returned more over the year.
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund and Vanguard Communication Services Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, VONG and VOX hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | VONG | VOX |
|---|---|---|
| Alphabet Inc | 3.91% | 16.14% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 3.20% | 21.12% |
| Alphabet Inc | 3.15% | 10.61% |
| Netflix Inc | 1.10% | 4.77% |
| ROBLOX Corp | 0.09% | 1.37% |
| Live Nation Entertainment Inc | 0.08% | 1.65% |
| Reddit Inc | 0.07% | 1.07% |
| AST SpaceMobile Inc | 0.07% | 1.42% |
| Take-Two Interactive Software Inc | 0.04% | 2.09% |
| Trade Desk Inc/The | 0.03% | 0.57% |
| Liberty Media Corp-Liberty Formula One | 0.02% | 1.16% |
| Pinterest Inc | 0.02% | 0.72% |
| Only in VONG | Only in VOX |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 13.09% | Verizon Communications Inc 4.17% |
| Apple Inc 11.97% | Walt Disney Co/The 3.96% |
| Microsoft Corp 8.98% | AT&T Inc 3.69% |
| Broadcom Inc 5.78% | Warner Bros Discovery Inc 2.74% |
| Amazon.com Inc 5.07% | T-Mobile US Inc 2.50% |
| Tesla Inc 3.48% | Comcast Corp 2.36% |
| Eli Lilly & Co 2.67% | Electronic Arts Inc 2.00% |
| Visa Inc 1.57% | Omnicom Group Inc 1.38% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
| VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund | VOX Vanguard Communication Services Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Vanguard | Vanguard |
| What it is | Russell 1000 Growth | Communication Services |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.2% | +2.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −10.3 pts | −14.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.09% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 95.6% | 84.5% |
| Holdings | 387 | 114 |
VONG in plain words
VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VOX in plain words
VOX is an index equity fund tracking the Communication Services. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 114 positions, with the top ten at 72.1%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, VONG or VOX?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VONG returned +7.2% and VOX returned +2.9%, so VONG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, VONG or VOX?
- VONG charges 0.07% a year and VOX charges 0.09%, so VONG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do VONG and VOX overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 96% of VONG and 84% of VOX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 12% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, VONG against VOX, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VONG-VOX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources