Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VONG vs VOO: how they differ

VONG and VOO hold 58% of their weight in the same names, and VOO returned more over the year.

Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund and Vanguard 500 Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VONG and VOO hold 58% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VONG and VOO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVONGVOO
NVIDIA Corp13.09%7.53%
Apple Inc11.97%6.61%
Microsoft Corp8.98%4.31%
Amazon.com Inc5.07%3.63%
Alphabet Inc3.91%3.26%
Broadcom Inc5.78%2.78%
Alphabet Inc3.15%2.60%
Meta Platforms Inc3.20%1.92%
Tesla Inc3.48%1.84%
Eli Lilly & Co2.67%1.48%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc1.47%1.47%
Visa Inc1.57%0.87%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VONGOnly in VOO
Snowflake Inc 0.26%Micron Technology Inc 2.02%
Spotify Technology SA 0.23%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.43%
Cloudflare Inc 0.23%JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.26%
Rocket Lab Corp 0.21%Intel Corp 1.03%
Astera Labs Inc 0.13%Johnson & Johnson 0.95%
NU Holdings Ltd/Cayman Islands 0.13%Exxon Mobil Corp 0.88%
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc 0.12%Cisco Systems Inc 0.72%
Natera Inc 0.09%UnitedHealth Group Inc 0.59%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VONG and VOO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund
VOO
Vanguard 500 Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isRussell 1000 GrowthS&P 500
Total return, 1 year+7.2%+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−10.3 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.07%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50095.6%100.0%
Holdings387506

VONG in plain words

VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VOO in plain words

VOO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 506 positions, with the top ten at 36.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VONG or VOO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VONG returned +7.2% and VOO returned +17.6%, so VOO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VONG or VOO?
VONG charges 0.07% a year and VOO charges 0.03%, so VOO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VONG and VOO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of VONG and 100% of VOO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 58% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VONG against VOO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VONG against VOO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VONG-VOO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources