Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
VOE vs XOVR: how they differ
VOE and XOVR hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VOE returned more over the year.
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, VOE and XOVR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in VOE | Only in XOVR |
|---|---|
| Cummins Inc 1.71% | Nvidia Corp 9.48% |
| Valero Energy Corp 1.34% | Astera Labs Inc 7.75% |
| Marathon Petroleum Corp 1.29% | Alphabet Inc 6.53% |
| CRH PLC 1.24% | Meta Platforms Inc 4.47% |
| United Rentals Inc 1.23% | Applovin Corp 3.95% |
| General Motors Co 1.21% | Natera Inc 3.70% |
| SLB Ltd 1.21% | Robinhood Markets Inc 3.56% |
| Simon Property Group Inc 1.20% | Veeva Systems Inc 3.17% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| VOE Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund | XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Vanguard | ERShares |
| What it is | Mid-Cap Value | Private-Public Crossover |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.2% | 0.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +2.7 pts | −17.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.05% | 0.75% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 96.6% | 43.4% |
| Holdings | 170 | 32 |
VOE in plain words
VOE is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 12.7%.
XOVR in plain words
XOVR is an index equity fund tracking the Private-Public Crossover. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned 0.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 32 positions, with the top ten at 63.1%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Oct 27, 2025 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, VOE or XOVR?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VOE returned +20.2% and XOVR returned 0.0%, so VOE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, VOE or XOVR?
- VOE charges 0.05% a year and XOVR charges 0.75%, so VOE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do VOE and XOVR overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 97% of VOE and 43% of XOVR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, VOE against XOVR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VOE-XOVR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources